Samantha Oulavong - La Chureca

July 7th, 2008 | Scroll down for comments

Samantha Oulavong started a non-profit called LOVE. LOVE stands for “Lens Of Vision & Expression.” Through LOVE Samantha provides digital photography workshops for non-profit organizations working with marginalized children. Last week I showed a set of photographs taken by her students, who are children of the La Chureca landfill outside Managua, Nicaragua. This week I’d like to show a set of Samantha’s photographs taken at the same time.

LOVE’s Website is coming soon: www.lensofvisionexpression.org
LOVE on Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/love-love

Samantha is currently in Phom Penh, through mid-August, conducting a workshop for children whose lives are affected by the HIV virus.

The bottom of the page

Are you interested in empowering marginalized people to document their own lives through photography? The reality is hard work and hard questions and a chance to make a difference. If you want to learn more, then Photovoice (www.photovoice.org) is a great place to get started. The website is loaded with information. You can partner with PhotoVoice directly, join the PhotoVoice forum, or purchase their detailed manual to help you start a project on your own.

Thanks for visiting. Now please leave a comment with your thoughts and observations. While you’re here sign up for our email list so you won’t miss future exhibitions!

Share/Save/Bookmark

9 Responses to “Samantha Oulavong - La Chureca”

  1. Would’ve liked to have seen a larger selection, as many of these are all too similar. “Man Walking” is my favourite here. I will check out her Flickr pics.

  2. I agree the set could be stronger. I also like Man Walking very much and also Young Mother and Child.

  3. Andy,

    I just saw your emails in regards to LOVE’s photo exhibition through your site…thank you so much Andy from the bottom of my heart for sharing my passion with the rest of the online community. Your support for my work and the children that LOVE works with is greatly appreciated.

    Sincerely,
    samantha

  4. a window on a world that I do not know, Nicaragua. a series of photo where i can feel the difficulty of the life of this people.

  5. It seems to me that your website is more about the photographers and not about the lives of the “marginalized people.” I work for an NGO, one that support children with AIDS, I have also worked with children on various art projects, as such I find that art that simply captures images of “marginalized people” does not empower or support them, and often walks a fine line between so called art for educational purposes and exploitative art. As a suggestion, I would love to see more information about the images, namely stories, backgrounds, interviews, etc. It is irresponsible for a website called Global Compassions to simply display the lives of people for interpretive purposes and not to provide more insight on their lives. What then is the difference between a photograph and a cage at the zoo?

  6. I appreciate your opinion and the passion with which you express it. I wonder what others have to say, so I’ll raise the point in my next post. Right now I’ll offer just a brief response with more to come.

    1. I agree that photographers walk a fine line and must examine themselves always, and as the host of this website (and as a photographer myself) the same goes for me. I’m pretty sensitive about what images I post here, and I think carefully about photos that show people in poverty. I think about who took them, why, and what they communicate. I happily include stories with them if the photographers provide stories. Keep in mind that these are photographers, not writers. Writing (esp. journalistic writing) is a serious discipline. If every photographer has to research and record the stories of his or her subjects, or work with a writer, then we’d limit the field to professionals and people with lots of spare time and money.

    2. I never ask for photos of people suffering or in poverty. People seem to assume that I want those kinds of pictures because of the title of the website. Now the website is taking a turn toward showing images of marginalized people, which may be inevitable, so I need to reconsider how to go forward. People have strong opinions about showing the plight of marginalized people. Google “Sebastiao Salgado” and you’ll get some idea of how people react to a very good pure photographer who has no hesitation about taking any photo with or without the story (stories are in the images). There are a lot of photos that do nothing but induce guilt for the sake of donations that I hold in very low regard compared with honest pictures taken by someone who is authentically there.

    3. People have different (always strong) opinions about showing images of people who are in poverty, suffering, etc. I don’t think there is a formulaic answer. Photos really reflect both the character of the photographer AND the character of the viewer. Viewers tend to approach photographs as consumers, and they are also responsible to consider whether they are crossing lines. This applies, in my opinion, whether they are looking at images of poor children or Angelina Jolie’s new twins (or Angelina Jolie). On this page, the images above were taken by someone, like yourself, working compassionately among the subjects. I don’t have stories, but there are links for people who want to learn more. I suspect people who strongly connect with these photos will contact the photographer.

    4. About stories…aren’t those potentially exploitative? Aren’t stories a form of entertainment? People read the newspaper both for information and entertainment, casually skimming tales of ruined lives while sipping coffee at Starbucks. Actually, people who really want to learn will connect and engage; people seeking passive entertainment will do that. I think both writers and photographers put there work out before angels and pigs, so to speak. Also, your “zoo” metaphor sounds serious but doesn’t really apply; these are pictures not people. As for the photos above, it takes a lot of time out for her to prepare and post photographs online. She is obviously putting time into her work with children as well. If she doesn’t have time to write the stories, then I know she is living in the midst of them and that’s why. Anyone who really wants to know more will find a way to learn more.

    5. Finally, I also have some knee jerk reactions about NGO’s that I could tell you about another time. Exploitation takes many forms. I’m sure if you have been in that work for awhile then you’ll know what I mean.

    I’ll keep this comment in mind, and thanks for raising the points. I agree there are lines that must not be crossed, and I’ll work on staying on the right side of them. Since few people agree about where the lines are located, it’s essential that visitors here make their opinions known.

  7. Thank you Andy for your response. I think that it is important to continue a dialogue about the politics of “social justice art.” In response to point 4, I agree that stories are obviously exploitative, and might I add even NGO’s, essays and books are written about this kind of exploitation. I simply would like to see a layout like the one from the photographer Masaru Goto in “Overcoming Hidden Discrimination,” where there is an intro and background info given. For me this info provides more clarity.

  8. Just keep in mind Masaru Goto is a dedicated, professional photojournalist and a very good one.

  9. [...] I want to call attention to a comment left on last week’s gallery. The commenter (Annie) expressed concern about marginalized people being exploited by having their photographs included here. I think her concerns are legitimate, and I will work to address them. I’d like to hear from others as well. I don’t want to cut and paste her comment and my response, but you can read them below last week’s gallery. [...]

Leave a Reply

Powered by WP Hashcash